You are searching about What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science, today we will share with you article about What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet. Hope this article on the topic What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science is useful to you.
Platonic Fullerene Science and World Peace
The political will of the country or nation that makes science and technology work, wants to control economic activities for the majority of people and maintain a security system to ensure the continuation of political power. This can be done in the name of democracy, plutocracy, dictatorship, religion, monarchies, etc. They all compete to establish a dominant ideology around aesthetics to convince their people that they are better than competing nations or tribes. So the idea of a one-world government must be a threat to the different systems of governing such ideas. However, it is possible to overcome this problem by using hard science to have a sustainable medical plan, designed to lead development to eternal peace on earth instead of endless conflicts. The only thing stopping this from happening is science itself.
As the full potential of nanotechnology becomes apparent, nuclear-armed nations will soon realize that they will no longer be immune. It is clear that nano-futuristic machines will be able to create invisible nano-destructive weapons and there are many volunteers who would be too noble to use them against civilians. Some would say that this is the natural destruction of humans in an overcrowded world. There will be many super soldiers who want to use nanotechnology to stop religious fanatics. On the other hand, nanotechnology can make anything from very little, including the production of food and water. Without reliable science the masters of nanotechnology will bring hell to earth. However, with reliable science to guide them, utopia is possible. In order to find that utopia, the scientific will to create it must first exist.
It is not only religious fanatics who suddenly destroy innocent civilians. This passion is essential to almost all trained scientists. The widespread desire of scientists around the world to lead ordinary people to the destruction of the tropics is the same, but it works slowly and systematically. Scientists need to realize why this is an accurate reflection of popular scientific opinion and distance themselves from the internal pressure to worship destructive chaos.
Nobel Prize winner Lord Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein used mathematics to prove that people should worship the destruction of chaos. Russell’s most famous article was entitled ‘A Freeman’s Worship’ in which he wrote that scientists should be governed by the law of physics that Einstein called the first law of all science, the law of universal chaos. Ultimately, Russell wrote, all human creativity will be completely destroyed within the universe in thermodynamic clay. The time of human extinction, in nano terms, has nothing to do with the long term predicted by Russell and Einstein.
In contrast to the devil’s worship of chaos, was Plato’s tradition of scientific philosophy that, in the third century BC, he developed the ‘Science of the End of Morals’. One may ask, what makes Plato’s ideas so important in the matter of human survival? The answer to this question is that Plato’s theory defines ‘evil’ as a destructive element of uncoordinated matter within the physical atom, which can be seen as destructive to civilization.
The same mathematical concepts that predicted the threat of nuclear destruction also apply to the misuse of nanotechnology. One might ask, who can you trust to run a good government for everyone’s benefit? The Platonic ‘good’ is defined as the existence of the health of the infinite universe. Therefore, the answer is that you can believe in medical science based on eternal evolution. The next question arises, how can you find an infinite evolution that works for the health of the universe when modern science forbids its existence?
The answer to this question is obvious. Nanotechnology has shown that the molecule of thought discovered in 1972 by Dr Candace Pert is part of a dynamic energy system that expands its thinking to the point where it is not enough to contradict Russell’s and Einstein’s view of the world. The mental molecule continuously expands the endocrine fluid structure that maintains human health within an infinite environment. This method is the foundation of the emerging science of quantum biology, which combines the power of chaos to transform human consciousness. Quantum biology tells us that it is time to stop worshiping the god of chaos that the ancient Greeks called the Devil.
Buckminster Fuller used Platonic mathematics to develop his unified model of the universe and three Nobel laureates in chemistry in 1996 named the basis of their new medical science as Fullerene Chemistry. Fuller wrote a book called ‘Utopia or Oblivion’ in which he said that we now have a choice governed by the law of chaos or the Platonic principles of nature. For non-scientists this means living in a universe governed by Platonic love.
From Fuller’s strong point of view, taken directly from Plato’s mathematics, the basic chemical science can be considered how nano-technology can be guided by the culture of the Platonic Oath, raising the ancient Hippocratic, used today. In the 18th and 19th centuries, a PhD in science means a doctorate in philosophy and the great philosophers of that time, who discovered great things about magnetism, used the mathematics of Platonic ethical science to create ethical electromagnetic physics. Any leading encyclopaedia will state that the inventor of electromagnetics, Hans Christian Oersted, wrote his doctoral thesis, based on the electromagnetic ethics written by the philosopher of science Emmanuel Kant.
Friedrich Schelling and Alexander Humboldt advanced electromagnetic theory in light of the recent discoveries of nanotechnology. The Platonic tradition of philosophy casts modern scientists as unwitting brute engineers, only supposed to help engineer Diabolic chaos. Although Kant’s work is very relevant to the scientific culture of the 21st Century, it is likely that very few scientists who read this article will have very little knowledge that anyone has ever thought about any kind of electromagnetic nature, or that scientists in the past wrote formulas to show it. how electromagnetic ethics goes E=Mc2.
They might ask themselves, is it true that I can’t think about such things, even though my PhD proves me to be a philosopher? Have I been taught that I cannot challenge Einstein’s worldview? Do I know that some scientists think that the universe is infinite in order to find solutions to complex engineering problems? Is it possible for me to be able to accelerate chaos in all my thoughts unless I consider connecting my hard-earned knowledge with the holographic reality of quantum biology?
These questions are very difficult. In the context of global power, there is little difference between the bomber who is accelerating the latest chaos on innocent people and the development of modern science which is doing the same thing in slow motion. Ignoring the existence of electromagnetic ethics in nanotechnology, giant mining machines are producing industrial equipment and large-scale fishing for dolphins while the nets are catching the sea. The tyrants do not know that nanotechnology can produce all things and food out of nothing.
It seems pointless to try to tell these things to people who want to promote destructive chaos and fear of job opportunities through the economy that turned the Kantian principles of world peace into an impossible concept of cancerous economic growth. Is it possible for scientists to allow their wise but unqualified studies to be overshadowed by the emerging science of science? People need to know what they are doing when they feel they have the responsibility to remain slaves to any form of 20th Century entropic mathematics, physics, politics, economics and the certainty of religion. Then they may be looking for ethical opportunities to become part of the future nano-quantum biology supra-science.
Georg Cantor’s mathematics is now an important part of modern science. It’s time to stop making him the most reviled mathematician in history because of his goal of using infinite mathematics to bring about world peace. Readers are encouraged to download ‘Physics of life: The dawn of quantum biology’ on Google to read about NASA’s findings related to this matter, as published in the journal Nature and which includes two chapters ‘Nature knows a few tricks that scientists don’t. ‘ and ‘This may only provide us with a few insights into the quest for quantum biology’.
© Professor Robert Pope, Advisor to the President Oceania and Australasia of the Institute for Theoretical Physics and Advanced Mathematics (IFM) Einstein-Galilei of the Theoretical Physics and Advanced Mathematics (IFM) Einstein-Galilei
Video about What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science
You can see more content about What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science on our youtube channel: Click Here
Question about What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science
If you have any questions about What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!
The article What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!
Rate Articles What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science
Rate: 4-5 stars
Search keywords What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science
What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science
way What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science
tutorial What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science
What Is The Difference Between Culinary Arts And Culinary Science free
#Platonic #Fullerene #Science #World #Peace